Valuation Rebuttal – Case Snapshot

(Bondi, NSW)

 

The opposing valuation materially overstated the property value due to critical errors in comparable selection and adjustment methodology.

 

Opposing Valuation: $3,050,000

Our Assessed Value: $2,000,000

Variance: –$1,050,000

 

$3.05m → $2.00m

 

The opposing valuation was materially overstated due to flawed comparable selection and unsupported adjustments.

 

Key Issues:

• Superior comparables used without proper adjustment 

• Inconsistent and unsupported adjustment approach 

• Relevant local sales evidence overlooked

 

Our Approach:

• Rebuilt comparable evidence set 

• Applied consistent adjustment framework 

• Delivered court-ready rebuttal

 

Outcome:

The revised valuation provided a significantly lower and more defensible market value, strengthening our client’s position in settlement negotiations. Result contributed to a materially improved settlement position.

 

William Wei, CPV 

Family Law | Rebuttal | Expert Witness

 

Specialising in:
• Family Law Valuation
• Rebuttal & Expert Witness Reporting
• Litigation-focused valuation analysis

​

Quick preliminary review available for disputed valuation matters

 

M 0411 913 335 

E William.wei@waui.com.au

W waui.com.au